Ruckman’s view of the KJV translators

Considering that Ruckman teaches that the KJV translators’ product is infallible, an examination of his views concerning them is in order. His views may surprise you. We will document our conclusions straight from Ruckman’s own writings. Ruckman’s teaching that the KJV is an inerrant translation naturally places extra scrutiny on its Continue reading →

Read more »

Ruckmanism overseas

There are many against Ruckmanism who believe such teaching is losing ground and fading fast, therefore it can safely be ignored. There is no doubt that it has fallen into disrepute, but we at Ruckmanism.org believe there is a danger in believing that Ruckmanism will simply go away if it Continue reading →

Read more »

What Ruckman admits to

During rare moments of introspection, Ruckman sometimes admits what could not be denied. We provide these quotes here because many Ruckman defenders will adamantly deny what Ruckman has actually admitted to in print. Ruckman admits that he is one of the crudest people you will ever meet and that he Continue reading →

Read more »

Is this plagiarism?

The two images contain a sample page on the left from Alban Douglas' book first copyrighted in 1966 One Hundred Bible Lessons: God's Answers to Man's Questions. On the right of the two images are a sample page from two different booklets from the series Theological Studies by Peter Ruckman Continue reading →

Read more »

Is Ruckman Arrogant?

Is Ruckman arrogant? His supporters say no. Geneha Kim in Ruckmanism Ruckus assures everyone that "Dr. Ruckman is not a prideful person claiming to be the final authority in the world." (p. 82). Perhaps to quell some concerns, in 1976 Ruckman assures his readers that he would write in a humble manner: We shall study and Continue reading →

Read more »

Semi-Ruckmanism and its dangers

Semi-Ruckmanism defined What is semi-Ruckmanism? Simply put, it consists of teaching some (though not all) of the same "Ruckmanisms" while using different terminology than Ruckman and claiming all along to be against Ruckmanism. In other words, semi-Ruckmanite views refer to reaching some of the same controversial conclusions as Ruckman regarding the KJV but differing Continue reading →

Read more »

Not applying his own teaching

Ruckman teaches that angels have no wings (Theological Studies, Booklet 18, p. 5). Ruckman has to deny that Seraphims are angels, as they have wings (Isa. 6:2). Note also that Dan. 9:21 and Rev. 14:6 describes an angel flying.  However, notice how he put wings on the angels in his artwork Continue reading →

Read more »