Search Results for: A look at Ruckman’s reasons for declaring the KJV to be superior to the originals

A look at Ruckman’s reasons for declaring the KJV to be superior to the originals

One of the distinctives of Ruckmanism that raises eyebrows is the unusual claim that the KJV is superior to the originals. Ruckman seems to think that his list of reasons are irrefutable, as demonstrated in the following boast:

Not one

Posted in Articles | 4 Comments

Ruckman’s disdain for the original manuscripts of the Bible

What are Ruckman’s views on the original manuscripts of the Bible? Are they biblical, and do they reflect conservative theological views? In some previous articles, we analyzed various issues that have a bearing on his views on the originals:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Outline of common mistakes people make regarding Ruckmanism

1. Thinking Ruckmanites are historic Baptists. Teaching double inspiration, advanced revelation, that the KJV corrects the Greek and is superior to it, works salvation after the rapture, etc., is not historic Baptist teaching.

2. Thinking they have little influence. See …

Posted in Articles | 12 Comments

Critique of Ruckmanism Ruckus, a book in defense of Peter Ruckman

Ruckmanism Ruckus was written by Geneha Kim, a 2006 graduate of Ruckman’s Bible institute. The foreword was written by William (Bill) Grady. It is 376 pages in length and was published in 2010. It was printed by Ruckman’s Bible Baptist …

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

Who was the first prominent KJV defender to influence others to declare the KJV to be inerrant or inspired in the 20th century?

To date, I am not familiar with any article, pamphlet, or book dedicated entirely to proving that the KJV is inerrant before Ruckman’s literature. What I have seen are passing references, often only once, in which the author stated or …

Posted in Articles | 17 Comments