He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls. (Prov. 25:28)
On numerous occasions Peter Ruckman appeals to Scripture in an attempt to justify his outrageous name-calling. It cannot be denied that on a few occasions our Lord used some tough language when dealing with certain people, most notably the Pharisees. However, our Lord is sovereign, and was consistently capable of expressing anger without ever committing sin and could see the heart of the person he was judging. This cannot be said of Dr. Ruckman or anyone else. Also, Christ in his omniscience knew whether or not a strong denunciation in a given situation would be counter-productive or not in the long run. There were a significant number of occasions when Christ turned away from a confrontation.
Ruckman also compares himself with such Bible characters as Jeremiah, Elijah, John the Baptist, and Paul in an attempt to justify his behavior. Ruckman seems to believe that the occasional tough language of Bible characters vindicate him, but it should be considered that we do not know the tone of voice used or to what extent the vocabulary used in a different language and culture thousands of years ago was as offensive or rude as it may sound to us in another language, time, and culture.
For proof of Ruckman's lack of balance, notice the phrase “the only proper way” in this quote:
“NAME CALLING” is the only proper way to preach when one is rebuking and warning. If you do not “call names,” it is not because you are loving, pious, circumspect, or “caring”; (Ruckman, Peter. Twenty-Two Years of the Bible Believers’ Bulletin Vol. 8 Essays on Bible Topics. 2010, p. 245)
Ruckman mocks those who believe in “what a sweet, kind, nice, wonderful person Jesus was.” (Ruckman’s Bible References: Personal Notes on Salient Verses in the Bible, p. 112). Instead, notice how he portrays Christ in the following terms that only a bitter unbeliever would be expected to use:
Deceived apostates find it impossible to believe that the Lord Jesus would be sarcastic, vicious, vengeful, insulting, unkind, or deceptive. Like nuts in the nut house, they are optimistic all the time, and fashion a god after their own “powers of positive thinking.” “I the Lord have deceived that prophet” (Ezek. 14:9) (Ruckman’s Bible References: Personal Notes on Salient Verses in the Bible, p. 65)
Many other attempts at bringing Christ down closer to his level can be found throughout Ruckman’s writings. Notice these examples, and look up the passages to see for yourself if his portrayal of Christ is accurate:
It was Christ who cussed out his host at the dinner table (Luke 11:38-52). (Ruckman, Peter. Twenty-Two Years of the Bible Believers’ Bulletin Vol. 8 Essays on Bible Topics. 2010, p. 182)
Jesus Christ…ripped, blasted, scalded, steamed, “tore hide,” “peeled the bark,” shelled the corn,” and came out with the most vicious (Matt. 23:17), scathing (Mat. 12:34) sarcastic (Mat. 15:14), rude (Mat. 8:22) and offensive (Mat. 16:3) diatribes known to man. (Ruckman, Peter. Pastoral Epistles: The Bible Believer’s Commentary Series. Pensacola, FL: Bible Baptist Bookstore, 1989, p. 186)
In the last quote above, all the verses except one that Ruckman used to portray Christ as vicious, scathing, sarcastic and offensive were in passages in which Christ was speaking directly at the Pharisees. The only case in the above quote not directed at Pharisees was Mat. 8:22, where Christ merely stated “Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.” As we have just demonstrated, nearly every time Ruckman gives a reference portraying Christ as rude and a name caller, it is when Christ was dealing directly with the scribes and Pharisees or similar unregenerate hypocritical religious leaders of his day.
See also Ruckman’s Twisted view of God.
Ruckman claims that “Paul was rude and crude in his preaching (see 1 Cor. 2:4),” (Ruckman’s Bible References: Personal Notes on Salient Verses in the Bible, p. 277) and yet the verse he furnished as proof says nothing of the kind:
1 Cor. 2:4 And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:
Ruckman has at times made reference to 2 Cor. 11:6 as if it vindicates him: “But though I be rude in speech, yet not in knowledge; but we have been throughly made manifest among you in all things.” However, notice that the same Greek word translated as “rude” in 2 Cor. 11:6 was translated as “ignorant” in Acts 4:13. This fact and the context of 1 Cor. 2:4 indicate that “rude” does not mean what Ruckman wants it to mean.
That Ruckman is clearly unbalanced in his name calling is evident by this statement as follows:
“Name calling” is perfectly proper when identifying and describing anything or anybody (see Matt. 23, 2 Pet. 2, etc.). (Ruckman, Peter. Bible Believers’ Bulletin. Oct. 1997, p. 19)
Matt. 23 was directed only at scribes and Pharisees, and “Jerusalem” where their religious headquarters was. In both biblical passages it can be observed that the “name calling” was not directed at singular individuals, but rather to people groups.
We do not deny that in certain situations some limited forms of strong verbal denunciations are proper, even in public settings, as well as signaling out individuals (just as we are doing here at Ruckmanism.org). But it should be kept in mind that the Bible contains many warnings against the abuse of language:
If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself. (1 Tim. 6:3-5)
A fool's lips enter into contention, and his mouth calleth for strokes. (Pro. 18:6)
By this, men will know that you are my disciples, that you love one another. (Jn. 13:35)
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. (Gal 5:14-16)
To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men. (Tit. 3:2)
Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. (Eph 4:29)
And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; (2 Tim. 2:24-25)
Even if Jesus was “rude”, does it occur to Ruckman (and others who use Jesus’ righteous behavior to defend their own sin) that they are not Jesus? Since they can rebuke people like Jesus, can they be crucified and rise from the dead like Jesus? I’m guessing no.
It should be noteworthy that Jesus Christ and the apostles only spoke rudely on occasion, special occasions, not in every sermon preached or in every book written during the entire course of their lives. Pete Ruckman is clearly out of balance by making a ministry out of being, “God’s Junkyard Dog,” as he proclaims himself to be! I didn’t even know God had a junkyard, much less a junkyard dog!
The junk yard is this world. The folks that he is addressing the names to are the modern day scribes and pharisees.
Well, then Ruck man needs to use Biblical language, such as generation of vipers…or whited seplucheres. Which he does NOT.
Dr. Ruckman is a great bible teacher. I’ve learned more from his material than any other half dozen preachers combined. He shoots straight, doesn’t sugar coat things. Why is it that so many men have become so soft & effiminate? Seems like many can’t take the truth. They’re constantly getting their “feelings hurt” or being “offended” by anyone who talks to them “roughly”. Go suck your bottle you little sissies. Time to grow up….and be MEN. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Bro. Ruckman’s language or attitude. God bless this great man of God. Wish there were more like him. I’m sick & tired of all the whiners.
“There is absolutely nothing wrong with Bro. Ruckman’s language or attitude.”
This reveals that you do not care what the Bible says about the matter. We just listed several passages that teach the opposite of what Ruckman does, and you ignore the plain Bible teaching and praise Ruckman. A classic cultic approach.
I have to say I’ve been suspicious of your site, however I’ve persevered with it. I now agree that Dr. Ruckman’s behaviour is wrong. My concern is that baby Christians will look at Dr. Ruckman as an example, but he’s not an ‘ensample to the flock’. The qualities of a bishop/pastor are listed for a reason, ‘sober, of good behaviour, not a brawler’ 1 Tim 3:2-3 and Dr Ruckman wasn’t qualified. Sad that he couldn’t step down. He could have still served the Lord without being a Pastor and an ‘example’.
Ruckman uses parts of the Bible to excuse his trashy attitude and writings. He interpretes "married to one wife", as married to "one wife at a time", to excuse his three marriages during his pastorship. He loves the fact that Paul was once called a heretic, and he uses this verse to cover up the fact that he and his followers are heretics. He uses Luther to excuse his trashy filthy offensive writings that bring shame to the KJV.
Ruckman's life goal was to start a movement based on his name. He always dreamed of "Ruckmanism" becoming a movement, like Calvinism, Lutheran, and Mennonite. But Ruckman's heretical garbage, trashy writings, and hate speech have solidified him as just another small time cult. Ruckmanite cult is dead without Ruckman. Ruckman is better off dead. Christianity doesn't need another small time heretic.